BIB-CollabLit.bib
@BOOK{Alford1995,
AUTHOR = {William P. Alford},
TITLE = {To Steal a Book Is an Elegant Offense},
PUBLISHER = {Stanford University Press},
YEAR = {1995},
ADDRESS = {Stanford, CA},
ANNOTE = {The book discusses the idea of intellectually
property, or the lack thereof, in Chinese literature
before the twentieth century. It argues that there
is an attitude toward literature that is based in
sharing and working together that is fundamentally
opposed to ideas of textual ownership and so
codified version of this idea in intellectual
property were out of context in Chinese culture.}
}
@BOOK{Berg1978,
AUTHOR = {A. Scott Berg},
TITLE = {Max Perkins: Editor of Genius},
PUBLISHER = {E. P. Dutton},
YEAR = {1978},
ADDRESS = {New York, NY},
ANNOTE = {Perkins, who edited a number of authors including
Fitzgerald, Hemingway and Thomas Wolfe, is an
interesting example of editing and the editor as a
collaborator. Unfortunately, Berg spends only a
minimal amount of time on this and I didn't find the
book of particular use for my paper and scrapped the
discussion of Perkins altogether. }
}
@BOOK{Cox1998,
AUTHOR = {Jeffrey N. Cox},
TITLE = {Poetry and Politics in the Cockney School},
PUBLISHER = {Cambridge University Press},
YEAR = {1998},
ADDRESS = {Cambridge, United Kingdom},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@BOOK{Daiches1941,
AUTHOR = {David Daiches},
TITLE = {The King James Version of the Bible: An Account of
the Development and Sources of the English Bible of
1611 with Special Reference to the Hebrew Tradition},
PUBLISHER = {University of Chicago Press},
YEAR = {1941},
ADDRESS = {Chicago, IL},
ANNOTE = {Daiches provides an in-depth look at the history of
the translation of the King James Bible. The end of
the first chapter gives an overview of the
collaborative process and the beginning of the
fourth chapter describes the rules which the
translation coalition operated under in great
detail.}
}
@ARTICLE{Daiute1986,
AUTHOR = {Collette Daiute},
TITLE = {Do 1 and 1 Make 2?},
JOURNAL = {Written Communication},
YEAR = {1986},
PAGES = {382-408},
ANNOTE = {Study of fourth and fifth grade students using word
processors working together and as groups. The
technological aspect is rather incidental except for
a few comments but she finds that the kids working
together, in almost all cases, causes the kids to
learn more about writing and to write better work
than when they work together. It's an example of
empirical evidence supporting collaboration.}
}
@BOOK{Eliot1971,
AUTHOR = {T. S. Eliot},
EDITOR = {Valerie Eliot},
TITLE = {The Waste Land: A Facsimile and Transcript of the
Original Drafts Including the Annotations of Ezra
Pound},
PUBLISHER = {Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.},
YEAR = {1971},
ADDRESS = {New York, NY},
ANNOTE = {In these Facsimile's the extensive editing of Ezra
Pound is clearly evident. In some spaces, entire
pages are crossed out and other parts are rewritten
wholesale. It's an excellent primary source of the
nature and the extensive nature of collaboration on
modern literary works.}
}
@BOOK{Evans1984,
AUTHOR = {G. R. Evans},
TITLE = {The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Earlier
Middle Ages},
PUBLISHER = {Cambridge University Press},
YEAR = {1984},
ADDRESS = {Cambridge, United Kingdom},
ANNOTE = {Along with other topics, the book details the
process of medieval annotations which are a unique and
amazing collaborative enterprise.}
}
@ARTICLE{Felder1983,
AUTHOR = {Leonard Felder},
TITLE = {Successful Collaboration: When Two Pens are Better
Than One},
JOURNAL = {Writer},
YEAR = {1983},
VOLUME = {96},
PAGES = {20-22},
MONTH = {December},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@BOOK{Gaebelien1924,
AUTHOR = {Frank E. Gaebelein},
TITLE = {Down through the Ages: The Story of the King James
Bible},
PUBLISHER = {The Macmillan Company},
ANNOTE = {Gaebelein's history begins with the origins of the
Bible, touches on the major English translations,
and ends with a discussion of the KJV. He is highly
religious and mentions but avoids conceding points
that he feels challenge the validity of the
Bible. His description of the collaborative
processes in the creation of the KJV is superficial
and quick but a good summation. His praise and
description of the quality of the KJV Bible is
unlikely to be paralleled.}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Laumer1977,
AUTHOR = {Keith Laumer},
EDITOR = {Damon Knight},
TITLE = {How to Collaboration without Getting Your Head
Shaved},
BOOKTITLE = {Turning Points: Essays on the Art of Science
Fiction},
PAGES = {215-217},
PUBLISHER = {Harper},
YEAR = {1977},
ADDRESS = {New York},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@BOOK{Leonard1994,
EDITOR = {James S. Leonard and Christine E. Warton and Robert
Murray David and Jeanette Harris},
TITLE = {Author-ity and Textuality: Current Views of
Collaborative Writing},
PUBLISHER = {Locust Hill Press},
YEAR = {1994},
ADDRESS = {West Cornwall, CT},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@ARTICLE{Levine1985,
AUTHOR = {Mark L. Levine},
TITLE = {Double Trouble},
JOURNAL = {Writer's Digest},
YEAR = {1985},
VOLUME = {65},
NUMBER = {3},
PAGES = {34-35},
MONTH = {March},
ANNOTE = {Leonard describes the article as ``Advice from a
lawyer about legal pitfalls of collaboration, and, a
sample ``Memorandum of Understanding.''''}
}
@BOOK{Lindsay1921,
AUTHOR = {W. M. Lindsay and H. J. Thomson},
TITLE = {Ancient Lore in Medieval Latin Glossaries},
PUBLISHER = {Oxford University Press},
YEAR = {1921},
ADDRESS = {London, England},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@ARTICLE{Max1998,
AUTHOR = {D. T. Max},
TITLE = {The Carver Chronicles},
JOURNAL = {The New Yorker Magazine},
YEAR = {1998},
PAGES = {35-40, 51, 56-67},
MONTH = {August},
DAY = {9},
ANNOTE = {This article describe the role of the author Gordon
Lish in the creation of Raymond Carter's short
stories which sat at the heart of the American
literary scene in the 1980's. The story mirrors the
relationship between Pound and Eliot but has some
more interesting questions of ownership and
copyright since it was more hidden and took place
during the 80's.}
}
@ARTICLE{Muller1985,
AUTHOR = {Marcia Muller and Bill Prozini},
TITLE = {Should You Collaborate?},
JOURNAL = {Writer},
YEAR = {1985},
VOLUME = {98},
NUMBER = {3},
PAGES = {7-10, 45},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@BOOK{Nesset1995,
AUTHOR = {Kirk Nesset},
TITLE = {The Stories of Raymond Carver: A Critical Study},
PUBLISHER = {Ohio University Press},
YEAR = {1995},
ADDRESS = {Athens, OH},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@BOOK{Neusner1973,
AUTHOR = {Jacob Neusner},
TITLE = {Invitation to the Talmud},
PUBLISHER = {Harper and Row Publishers},
YEAR = {1973},
ADDRESS = {New York, NY},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@BOOK{Stillinger1991,
AUTHOR = {Jack Stillinger},
TITLE = {Multiple Authorship and the Myth of Solitary Genius},
PUBLISHER = {Oxford University Press},
YEAR = {1991},
ADDRESS = {New York},
ANNOTE = {Leonard says, ``proposes that the acknowledgment of
multiple authorship tends to result in devaluation
of a literary work.''}
}
@BOOK{Strack1972,
AUTHOR = {Hermann L. Strack},
TITLE = {Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash},
PUBLISHER = {Atheneum},
ADDRESS = {New York, NY},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@BOOK{Stull1993,
EDITOR = {William L. Stull and Maureen P. Carroll},
TITLE = {Remembering Ray: A Composite Biography of Raymond
Carver},
PUBLISHER = {Capra Press},
YEAR = {1993},
ADDRESS = {Santa Barbara, CA},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@BOOK{Vail2001,
AUTHOR = {Jeffrey W. Vail},
TITLE = {The Literary Relationship of Lord Byron and Thomas Moore},
PUBLISHER = {Johns Hopkins University Press},
YEAR = {2001},
ADDRESS = {Baltimore, MD},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@ARTICLE{Watson1985,
AUTHOR = {Virginia Watson-Rouslin and Jean M.Peck},
TITLE = {Double Time},
JOURNAL = {Writer's Digest},
YEAR = {1985},
VOLUME = {65},
NUMBER = {3},
PAGES = {32, 34, 36},
MONTH = {March},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@INBOOK{Zall1966,
EDITOR = {Paul M. Zall},
TITLE = {Literary Criticism of William Wordsworth},
CHAPTER = {Essay, Supplementary to the Preface},
PUBLISHER = {University of Nebraska Press},
YEAR = {1966},
ANNOTE = {Quoted in Woodmansee1984 with a great block quote. I
imagine that that is all that I'll use from it.}
}
@ARTICLE{Woodmansee1984,
AUTHOR = {Martha Woodmansee},
TITLE = {The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal
Conditions of the Emergence of the Author},
JOURNAL = {Eighteenth Century Studies},
YEAR = {1984},
VOLUME = {17},
NUMBER = {4},
PAGES = {425-448},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@BOOK{Woodmansee1994,
EDITOR = {Martha Woodmansee and Peter Jaszi},
TITLE = {The Construction of Authorship: Textual
Appropriation in Law and Literature},
PUBLISHER = {Duke University Press},
YEAR = {1994},
ADDRESS = {Durham, NC},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Jaszi1994,
AUTHOR = {Peter Jaszi},
EDITOR = {Martha Woodmansee and Peter Jaszi},
TITLE = {On the Author Effect: Recovering Collectivity},
BOOKTITLE = {The Construction of Authorship: Textual
Appropriation in Law and Literature},
PUBLISHER = {Duke University Press},
YEAR = {1994},
PAGES = {29-56},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@BOOK{Vaidhyanathan2001,
AUTHOR = {Siva Vaidhyanathan},
TITLE = {Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual
Property and How it Threatens Creativity},
PUBLISHER = {New York University Press},
YEAR = {2001},
ADDRESS = {New York, NY},
ANNOTE = {Vaidhyanathan argues for ``thin'' rather than
``thick'' copyright protection. He tries to argue
this by saying copyright should be ``policy'' and
not ``property'' and by tracing the history of
copyright law during the 20th century.}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Woodmansee1994a,
AUTHOR = {Martha Woodmansee},
EDITOR = {Martha Woodmansee and Peter Jaszi},
TITLE = {On the Author Effect: Recovering Collectivity},
BOOKTITLE = {The Construction of Authorship: Textual
Appropriation in Law and Literature},
PUBLISHER = {Duke University Press},
YEAR = {1994},
PAGES = {15-28},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@BOOK{Lay1991,
EDITOR = {Harry M. Lay and William M. Karis},
TITLE = {Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigation in
Theory and Practice},
PUBLISHER = {Baywood},
YEAR = {1991},
ADDRESS = {Amityville, NY},
ANNOTE = {Leonard: This collection of essays is divided into
four sections. The first addresses theoretical
concerns; the second provides case-study
applications; the third explores th connections
between collaborative writing practices and
telecommunications and computer-assisted learning;
the final section is titled ``Current Industrial
Concerns: Gathering, Verifying, and Editing
Information.''}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Farkas1991,
AUTHOR = {David K. Farkas},
EDITOR = {Harry M. Lay and William M. Karis},
TITLE = {Collaborative Writing, Software Development, and the
Universe of Collaborative Activity},
BOOKTITLE = {Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigation in
Theory and Practice},
PUBLISHER = {Baywood},
YEAR = {1991},
PAGES = {13-30},
ADDRESS = {Amityville, NY},
ANNOTE = {Farkas lays out a definition of collaboration and a
description of why collaboration is difficult. While
I disagree with what he does with it, his
definition and analysis is important and
unusual. He divides collaboration into productive
and unproductive and problematic and
unproblematic. He continues by looking at literary
collaboration in the context of collaboration on
software development.}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Weiss1991,
AUTHOR = {Timothy Weiss},
EDITOR = {Harry M. Lay and William M. Karis},
TITLE = {Bruffee, the Bakhtin Circle and the Concept of
Collaboration},
BOOKTITLE = {Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigation in
Theory and Practice},
PUBLISHER = {Baywood},
YEAR = {1991},
PAGES = {31-48},
ADDRESS = {Amityville, NY},
ANNOTE = {Weiss reads Bruffee's ideas of collaboration in the
context of this idea of knowledge forwarded by
Bakhtin and thinkers around him. The section on
communication as collaboration is interesting
because the Bakhtin circle defines communication as
the collaborative construction of ideas.}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Weber1991,
AUTHOR = {James R. Weber},
EDITOR = {Harry M. Lay and William M. Karis},
TITLE = {The Construction of Multi-Authored Texts in One
Laboratory Setting},
BOOKTITLE = {Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigation in
Theory and Practice},
PUBLISHER = {Baywood},
YEAR = {1991},
PAGES = {49-64},
ADDRESS = {Amityville, NY},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Couture1991,
AUTHOR = {Barbara Couture and Jone Rymer},
EDITOR = {Harry M. Lay and William M. Karis},
TITLE = {Discourse Interaction between Writer and Supervisor:
A Primary Collaboration in Workplace Writing},
BOOKTITLE = {Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigation in
Theory and Practice},
PUBLISHER = {Baywood},
YEAR = {1991},
PAGES = {87-108},
ADDRESS = {Amityville, NY},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Malone1991,
AUTHOR = {Elizabeth L. Malone},
EDITOR = {Harry M. Lay and William M. Karis},
TITLE = {Facilitating Groups through Selective Participation:
An Example of Collaboration from NASA},
BOOKTITLE = {Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigation in
Theory and Practice},
PUBLISHER = {Baywood},
YEAR = {1991},
PAGES = {109-119},
ADDRESS = {Amityville, NY},
ANNOTE = {Malone argues that looking at groups academically if
flawed because it doesn't look at groups as dynamic
coalitions that can change over time and then
provides and example to the contrary.}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Duin1991,
AUTHOR = {Ann Hill Duin and Linda A. Jorn and Mark S. DeBower},
EDITOR = {Harry M. Lay and William M. Karis},
TITLE = {Collaborative Writing--Courseware and
Telecommunications},
BOOKTITLE = {Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigation in
Theory and Practice},
PUBLISHER = {Baywood},
YEAR = {1991},
PAGES = {146-169},
ADDRESS = {Amityville, NY},
ANNOTE = {These authors emphasize the role of communication in
collaboration and the creation of lots and lots of
smaller document that lead into larger documents.}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Pelt1991,
AUTHOR = {William Van Pelt and Alice Gillam},
EDITOR = {Harry M. Lay and William M. Karis},
TITLE = {Peer Collaboration and the Computer-Assisted
Classroom: Bridging the Gap between Academics and
the Workplace},
BOOKTITLE = {Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigation in
Theory and Practice},
PUBLISHER = {Baywood},
YEAR = {1991},
PAGES = {170-205},
ADDRESS = {Amityville, NY},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Shirk1991,
AUTHOR = {Henrietta Nickles Shirk},
EDITOR = {Harry M. Lay and William M. Karis},
TITLE = {Collaborative Editing: A Combination of Peer and
Hierarchical Editing Techniques},
BOOKTITLE = {Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigation in
Theory and Practice},
PUBLISHER = {Baywood},
YEAR = {1991},
PAGES = {242-261},
ADDRESS = {Amityville, NY},
ANNOTE = {The article investigates the ideas of peer versus
hierarchical editing. The analysis is interesting
and the methodology solid. In drawing conclusions,
Shirk analysis is wishy-washy and makes some
conclusions that says both are good but we don't
want to play favorites.}
}
@ARTICLE{Wiener1986,
AUTHOR = {Harvey S. Wiener},
TITLE = {Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: A Guide to
Evaluation},
JOURNAL = {College English},
YEAR = {1986},
VOLUME = {48},
NUMBER = {1},
PAGES = {52-61},
OPTANNOTE = {downloaded but unread - all about Consensus based
decision making}
}
@BOOK{Collins1964,
AUTHOR = {Barry E. Collins and Harold Guetzkow},
TITLE = {A social psychology of group processes for
decision-making},
PUBLISHER = {Wiley},
YEAR = {1964},
ADDRESS = {New York, NY},
ANNOTE = {The authors introduce a concept of the
``assemblage'' affect which states that a group's
final product superior is superior to that of even
the best member's individual efforts. Cited in the
introduction to Collaborative Writing in Industry
(Lay1991).}
}
@ARTICLE{Ede1985,
AUTHOR = {Lisa Ede and Andrea Lunsford},
TITLE = {Research in Collaborative Writing},
JOURNAL = {Technical Communication},
YEAR = {1985},
VOLUME = {32},
NUMBER = {4},
PAGES = {69-70},
ANNOTE = {This is a survey of six major professions. The
authors find that 87 percent of respondents wrote
collaboratively at least ``sometimes.''}
}
@ARTICLE{Ede1986,
AUTHOR = {Lisa Ede and Andrea Lunsford},
TITLE = {Why Write ... Together: A Research Update},
JOURNAL = {Rhetoric Review},
YEAR = {1986},
VOLUME = {5},
NUMBER = {1},
PAGES = {71-81},
ANNOTE = {The authors describe seven variables in
collaborative writing groups which success and
satisfaction will depend on: control, credit,
modifications, procedures for dispute resolution,
flexibility with pre-established formats, deadlines
and other constraints, and these status of the project
within the organization.}
}
@ARTICLE{Ede1986a,
AUTHOR = {Lisa Ede and Andrea Lunsford},
TITLE = {Collaborative Learning: Lessons from the World of Work},
JOURNAL = {Writing Programs Administrator},
YEAR = {1986},
VOLUME = {9},
NUMBER = {3},
PAGES = {11-26},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@UNPUBLISHED{Dix1992,
AUTHOR = {Alan J. Dix and Victoria C. Miles},
TITLE = {Version control for asynchronous group work},
NOTE = {YCS 181, Department of Computer Science, University
of York, (Poster presentation HCI'92: People and
Computers VII)},
YEAR = {1992},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@INPROCEEDINGS{Dix1997,
AUTHOR = {Alan Dix and Roberta Mancini and Stefano Levialdi},
TITLE = {Communication, Action and History},
BOOKTITLE = {Proceedings of CHI'97},
ADDRESS = {Atlanta, GA},
ORGANIZATION = {ACM},
PUBLISHER = {ACM Press},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@INPROCEEDINGS{Kirby1997,
AUTHOR = {Andy Kirby and Paul Rayson and Tom Rodden and Ian
Sommerville and Alan Dix},
TITLE = {Versioning the Web},
BOOKTITLE = {7th International Workshop on Software Configuration
Management},
PAGES = {163-173},
YEAR = {1997},
EDITOR = {R. Conradi},
ADDRESS = {Boston, MA},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@INPROCEEDINGS{Dix1997a,
AUTHOR = {Alan Dix and Tom Rodden and Ian Sommerville},
TITLE = {Modeling Versions in Collaborative Work},
BOOKTITLE = {IEE Proceedings in Software Engineering},
YEAR = {1997},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@INPROCEEDINGS{Vitali1995,
AUTHOR = {Fabio Vitali and David G. Durand},
TITLE = {Using versioning to support collaboration on the
WWW},
BOOKTITLE = {Fourth World Wide Web Conference},
YEAR = {1995},
NOTE = {Electronic publication at
\url{http://www.w3.org/pub/Conferences/WWW4/Papers/190/}},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@MISC{Wiki2003,
TITLE = {Wiki},
HOWPUBLISHED = {Published Electronically at
\url{http://c2.com/cgi/wiki}},
MONTH = {March},
YEAR = {2003},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@MISC{BernersLee1989,
AUTHOR = {Tim Berners-Lee},
TITLE = {Information Management: A Proposal},
HOWPUBLISHED = {Published Electronically at:
\url{http://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html}},
YEAR = {1989},
ANNOTE = {The original document laying out the plan for the
World Wide Web, before it was even called that. File
store locally.}
}
@MISC{Ditlea1997,
AUTHOR = {Steve Ditlea},
TITLE = {Xanadu's Creator at 60: Still Visionary, Still
Cantankerous},
NOTE = {New York Times, June 21, 1997},
ANNOTE = {Article written after an interview with Ted Nelson
in 1997 with some good quotes and a description of
his history. File stored locally.}
}
@ARTICLE{Callister1995,
AUTHOR = {Lee Callister},
TITLE = {ZigZag and Xanadu: A Chat with Ted Nelson},
JOURNAL = {Digiville NuMedia Gazette},
YEAR = {1995},
OPTANNOTE = {downloaded}
}
@ARTICLE{SpringGardner1994,
AUTHOR = {Cara Spring-Gardner},
TITLE = {In Search of Xanadu},
JOURNAL = {The Message},
YEAR = {1994},
VOLUME = {8},
PAGES = {14-15},
MONTH = {October},
OPTANNOTE = {downloaded}
}
@MISC{Xanadu2001,
TITLE = {Project Xanadu® History (lo-res)},
HOWPUBLISHED = {Published Electronically at:
\url{http://xanadu.com/HISTORY/}},
MONTH = {May},
YEAR = {2001},
NOTE = {Accessed March 20, 2003},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@ARTICLE{Bush1945,
AUTHOR = {Vannevar Bush},
TITLE = {As We May Think},
JOURNAL = {The Atlantic Monthly},
YEAR = {1945},
PAGES = {106-107},
MONTH = {July},
ANNOTE = {This is the article from 1945 that is credited with
being the first introduction of the concept of
hypertext. File stored locally.}
}
@BOOK{Nelson1981,
AUTHOR = {Theodor Holmes Nelson},
TITLE = {Literary Machines},
PUBLISHER = {Self Published},
YEAR = {1981},
ADDRESS = {Swarthmore, PA},
EDITION = {3rd},
ANNOTE = {This is an amazing book and an amazing resource. It
details Xanadu, Ted Nelson's hypertext system but
introduces all the concepts that he feels are
necessary to understanding it. This includes his
philosophy on literature, creativity, version
control and other type of control. His attitudes
toward legal control and copyright seems strange and
rather controlling but the end result might be
interesting. His work is visionary and
incalculably useful in any technical or
philosophical discussion of collaborative writing.}
}
@MISC{Udanax1999,
TITLE = {Udanax Green Febe Protocol},
NOTE = {Published electronically at
\url{http://www.udanax.com/green/febe/index.html}},
ANNOTE = {This is the adaptation of the 1988 Xanadu Green
manual for the Web. It explain the interface between
the front-end and back-end within the software.}
}
@MISC{Lessig2002,
AUTHOR = {Lawrence Lessig, et all},
TITLE = {Eldred v. Ashcroft: Brief for the Petitioners},
YEAR = {2002},
NOTE = {Supreme Court of the United States. No. 01-618.},
ANNOTE = {Brief field by the government in Eldred v. Ashcroft
in the Supreme Court challenge to the Sonny Bono
CTEA. It discusses all kinds of information on
collaboration, sharing, and the negative effect of
legal control on these processes and literature
more broadly. Available:
\url{http://eon.law.harvard.edu/openlaw/eldredvashcroft/supct/opening-brief.pdf}
and locally.}
}
@MISC{Balkin2002,
AUTHOR = {Jack M. Balkin, et all},
TITLE = {Eldred v. Ashcroft: Brief of Jack M. Balkin, Yochai
Benkler, Burt Neuborne, Robert Post, and Jed
Rubenfeld as Amici Curiae in Support of the
Petitioners},
YEAR = {2002},
NOTE = {Supreme Court of the United States. No. 01-618.},
ANNOTE = {Available:
\url{http://eon.law.harvard.edu/openlaw/eldredvashcroft/supct/amici/conlawprofs.pdf}
and locally.}
}
@MISC{Moglen2002,
AUTHOR = {Eben Moglen},
TITLE = {Eldred v. Ashcroft: Brief Amicus Curiae of the Free
Software Foundation in Support of Petitioners},
YEAR = {2002},
NOTE = {Supreme Court of the United States. No. 01-618.},
ANNOTE = {Available:
\url{http://eon.law.harvard.edu/openlaw/eldredvashcroft/supct/amici/fsf.pdf}
and locally.}
}
@MISC{Jaszi2002,
AUTHOR = {Peter Jaszi},
TITLE = {Eldred v. Ashcroft: Brief of Amici Curiae National Writers Union, et all},
YEAR = {2002},
NOTE = {Supreme Court of the United States. No. 01-618.},
ANNOTE = {Available:
\url{}
and locally.}
}
@MISC{Englert2002,
AUTHOR = {Roy T. Englert, Jr.},
TITLE = {Eldred v. Ashcroft: Brief of Amici Curiae in Support
of Petitioners},
YEAR = {2002},
NOTE = {United States Supreme Court. No. 01-618.},
ANNOTE = {Available:
\url{http://eon.law.harvard.edu/openlaw/eldredvashcroft/supct/amici/economists.pdf}
and locally. This is written for 17 economists
listed on the front page.}
}
@MISC{Lutzker2002,
AUTHOR = {Arnold P. Lutzker},
TITLE = {Eldred v. Ashcroft: Brief of Amici Curiae in Support
of Petitioners},
YEAR = {2002},
NOTE = {United States Supreme Court. No. 01-618.},
ANNOTE = {Lutzker writes on behalf of library association and
discusses in depth issues of preservation and the
fact that CTEA certainly will not aid in the
preservation of older and deteriorated copyrighted
works as the government and copyright holders were
arguing. Available:
\url{http://eon.law.harvard.edu/openlaw/eldredvashcroft/supct/amici/libraries.pdf}
and locally. This is written for the American
Library Association and fourteen other library
associations.}
}
@MISC{Eldred2003,
TITLE = {Eldred v. Ashcroft: Legal Documents: Supreme Court},
HOWPUBLISHED = {Published Electronically at:
\url{http://www.eldred.cc/legal/supremecourt.html}},
YEAR = {2003},
NOTE = {Accessed 22 April 2003},
ANNOTE = {A list of all the documents filed in the Supreme
Court case for Eldred v. Ashcroft.}
}
@MISC{Morrill2002,
AUTHOR = {Robert B. Morrill},
TITLE = {Micrel, Inc. v. Linear Technology Corp.: Petition
for a Writ of Certiorari},
HOWPUBLISHED = {Published Electronically at:
\url{http://www.goldsteinhowe.com/blog/files/Micrel\%20Reply\%20Final.pdf}},
MONTH = {September 19},
YEAR = {2002},
NOTE = {Supreme Court of the United States. No. 02-39},
ANNOTE = {Uses a citation from Websters 1913.}
}
@MISC{SCOTUS2003,
AUTHOR = {Supreme Court of the United States},
YEAR = {2003},
NOTE = {537 U. S. Eldred v. Ashcroft (2003)},
ANNOTE = {The text of the decision, written by Justice
Ginsberg. Of course, the petitions are defeated in a
7-2 vote. Dissents by Stevens and Breyer are well
written but not included in this file. Ginsburg
gives only three pages to the petitioners First
Amendment argument.}
}
@MISC{USCO2000,
AUTHOR = {United States Copyright Office},
TITLE = {Copyright Basics},
HOWPUBLISHED = {Published Electronically at
\url{http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html}},
MONTH = {September},
YEAR = {2000},
ANNOTE = {This is a good primer on copyright copyright basics
as the law stands. Its updated frequently enough to
stay current and is long and in depth enough to
cover a bit of the background, history, and more of
a FAQ sort of use as well.}
}
@MISC{Russo1993,
AUTHOR = {Jack Russo and Jamie Nafziger},
TITLE = {Software ``Look And Feel'' Protection in the 1990's},
HOWPUBLISHED = {Published Electronically at
\url{http://www.computerlaw.com/lookfeel.html}},
YEAR = {1993},
NOTE = {Accessed 31 March 2003},
ANNOTE = {While the article is a bit old and very pro look and
feel copyright, it provides a good background on the
case history, both for and against, copyright on
software look and feel and is an extremely useful
resource in this regard.}
}
@MISC{DigitalSpeech2003,
AUTHOR = {Digital Speech Project},
TITLE = {About the DMCA},
HOWPUBLISHED = {Published Electronically at
\url{http://www.digitalspeech.org/dmca.shtml}},
YEAR = {2003},
NOTE = {Accessed 31 March 2003},
ANNOTE = {This page includes a short description of the DMCA
and its effects and then a pieced called ``The DMCA
and You'' by Larry Garfield.}
}
@MISC{SCOTUS1879,
AUTHOR = {Supreme Court of the United States},
TITLE = {Baker v. Selden},
YEAR = {1879},
NOTE = {101 U.S. 99 (Mem)},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@MISC{SCOTUS1903,
AUTHOR = {Supreme Court of the United States},
TITLE = {Bleinstein v. Donaldson Lithographing Company},
MONTH = {February},
YEAR = {1903},
NOTE = {188 U.S. 239},
ANNOTE = {In this case, the court decides on whether a series
of lithographs of circus posters are
copyrightable. It cuts to the center of this idea of
whether something that is functional can still be
original an creative and questions about what one
can copyright and what one can not.}
}
@MISC{SCOTUS1884,
AUTHOR = {Supreme Court of the United States},
TITLE = {Burrow-Giles Lithographic Company v. Sarony},
MONTH = {March},
YEAR = {1884},
NOTE = {111 U.S. 53},
ANNOTE = {In a case about a photograph of Oscar Wilde, the
case establishes the copyrightability of photography
and also talks a lot about the idea of authorship
and originality and places this conception of
authorship with the photographer (as opposed to an
actor).}
}
@MISC{SCOTUS1954,
AUTHOR = {Supreme Court of the United States},
TITLE = {Mazer v. Stein},
MONTH = {March 8},
YEAR = {1954},
NOTE = {347 U.S. 201},
ANNOTE = {The last paragraph has a great passage describing
copyright's foundation is the benefit of the public
and the people as opposed to the copyright holders
themselves.}
}
@MISC{SCOTUS1990,
AUTHOR = {Supreme Court of the United States},
TITLE = {Stewart et al. v. Abend, DBA Authors Research Co.},
MONTH = {April 24},
YEAR = {1990},
NOTE = {495 U.S. 207},
ANNOTE = {A rather complex case about an author who sold
rights during oner period of copyright and then
copyright was extended multiple times and it was
unclear who owned the work or what the film company
could do with their version of the work when their
ownership of the copyright had expired. It has a
great quote about the importance of limited times.}
}
@MISC{SCOTUS1985,
AUTHOR = {Supreme Court of the United States},
TITLE = {Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., et al. v. Nation
Enterprises et al.},
MONTH = {May 20},
YEAR = {1985},
NOTE = {471 U.S. 539},
ANNOTE = {Former President Ford has contracted with a
publisher to publish his memoirs and then a chunk of
them were published without permission by the
Nation.}
}
@MISC{FedAppeals1986,
AUTHOR = {United States Court of Appeals for the Third
Circuit},
TITLE = {Whelan Associates, Inc. v. Jaslow Dental Laboratory,
Inc},
MONTH = {August},
YEAR = {1986},
NOTE = {797 F.2d 1222},
ANNOTE = {This was one of the first ``look and feel'' court
cases.}
}
@MISC{FedAppeals1994,
AUTHOR = {United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit},
TITLE = {Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, Inc.},
MONTH = {September},
YEAR = {1994},
NOTE = {35 F.3d 1435},
ANNOTE = {A landmark look and feel argument. File stored
locally.}
}
@MISC{USDC1998,
AUTHOR = {United State District Court for the Northern
District of Georgia, Atlanta Division},
TITLE = {Estate Of Martin Luther King, Jr., Inc. v. CBS,
Inc.},
MONTH = {July 22},
YEAR = {1998},
NOTE = {13 F. Supp. 2d 1347},
ANNOTE = {This is the original case where MLK's estate has
sued CBS for copyright infringement for publishing
most of the famous ``I have a dream'' speach. In
this opinion, the court decides on a technicality in
regards to pre 1976 copyright law that because MLK
had not put a copyright symbol on the speech, the
speech has fallen into the public domain.}
}
@MISC{FedAppeals1999,
AUTHOR = {United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh
Circuit},
TITLE = {Estate Of Martin Luther King, Jr., Inc. v. CBS,
Inc.},
MONTH = {November 5},
YEAR = {1999},
NOTE = {194 F.3d 1211},
ANNOTE = {In this appeal of USDC1998, the court reverse the
opinion, taking Martin Luther King's speech out of
the public domain.}
}
@MISC{USDC2002,
AUTHOR = {United State District Court for the Northern
District of Georgia, Atlanta Division},
TITLE = {Estate Of Martin Luther King, Jr., Inc. v. CBS,
Inc.},
MONTH = {February 15},
YEAR = {2002},
NOTE = {184 F. Supp. 2d 1353},
ANNOTE = {Continuing Martin Luther King v. CBS saga. In this
case, the argument is about whether to keep
testimony from the first case sealed.}
}
@MISC{USDC1987,
AUTHOR = {United States District Court for the Northern
District of California},
TITLE = {Fantasy, Inc. v. Fogerty},
MONTH = {July 8},
YEAR = {1987},
NOTE = {664 F. Supp. 1345},
ANNOTE = {This is the case in which John Fogerty is sued by
his former record company for infringing the
copyright on a song that Fogerty wrote earlier in
his career.}
}
@MISC{FedAppeals1993,
AUTHOR = {United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit},
TITLE = {Fantasy, Inc. v. Fogerty},
MONTH = {February 2},
YEAR = {1993},
NOTE = {984 F.2d 1524},
ANNOTE = {A continuation of the case above. This case focuses
mostly on attorney fees.}
}
@ARTICLE{Rothnie1998,
AUTHOR = {Warwick A Rothnie},
TITLE = {Idea and Expression in a Digital World},
JOURNAL = {Journal of Law and Information Science},
YEAR = {1998},
VOLUME = {9},
NUMBER = {1},
ANNOTE = {All I have of this work is the abstract that reads:
``This paper explores the dichotomy between `ideas'
and `expression' in copyright law. Copyright has
traditionally subsisted in the expression of ideas,
not in the ideas themselves. Application of the
idea/expression dichotomy has become increasingly
difficult with the advent of digital technology,
since the distinction between ideas and their
expression is often difficult to identify. Through a
discussion of the relevant case law, the author
argues that the two concepts have, to an extent,
converged. He concludes that while the
idea/expression dichotomy still exists in the
digital environment, it may not provide solutions to
all the problems that may arise from treating
computer programs as copyright subject matter.''}
}
@ARTICLE{Zittrain2002,
AUTHOR = {Jonathan Zittrain},
TITLE = {Calling Off the Copyright War: In battle of property
vs. free speech, no one wins},
JOURNAL = {Boston Globe},
YEAR = {2002},
MONTH = {November},
NOTE = {22},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@UNPUBLISHED{MIT2002,
AUTHOR = {Siva Vaidhyanathan and Jonathan Zittrain},
TITLE = {Copyright and Culture},
NOTE = {MIT Communication Forum Panel Discussion. 6 November
2002. Bartos Theater, MIT Media Lab, 20 Ames Street},
YEAR = {2002},
ANNOTE = {Vaidhyanathan's comments are mostly background on
copyright and some of its effects. Zittrain presents
a very entertaining and well documented argument
where he implies many of the arguments in his
``Calling off the copyright war'' argument and
presents what he calls a gap between `Title 17 and
Reality complete with graphs and all.}
}
@ARTICLE{Bannon1996,
AUTHOR = {Lisa Bannon},
TITLE = {Lawsuit threat means silence around the campfire },
JOURNAL = {Chicago Sun Times},
YEAR = {1996},
PAGES = {3},
MONTH = {August},
NOTE = {22},
ANNOTE = {Shorter version of the WSJ article on the girl scout
threats by ASCAP.}
}
@ARTICLE{Bannon1996a,
AUTHOR = {Lisa Bannon},
TITLE = {The birds may sing, but campers can't unless they
pay up},
JOURNAL = {The Wall Street Journal},
YEAR = {1996},
MONTH = {August},
NOTE = {22. Reprinted in South-Coast Today.},
ANNOTE = {The full version that was retrieved from South-Coast
Today's website at
\url{http://www.s-t.com/daily/08-96/08-23-96/b02li056.htm}.
This fantastic article describes the way that ASCAP
officials threated a number of camps including the
Girl Scouts of America an d how this goal blown out
of proportion. It's a perfect example of the way
that copyright law and the copyright holders are
simply not meshing with reality. I heard about the
story first in Zittrain talk mentioned in
Zittrain2002.}
}
@ARTICLE{HeraldSun2000,
AUTHOR = {Herald Sun Melbourne},
TITLE = {DVD Copy Case},
JOURNAL = {Herald Sun Melbourne},
YEAR = {2000},
NOTE = {22 January},
ANNOTE = {This is the first mention in a major American paper
that I found of Jon Johansen getting arrested.}
}
@ARTICLE{Harvey2000,
AUTHOR = {Ian Harvey},
TITLE = {Netizens Rally Behind Teen Hacker},
JOURNAL = {Toronto Sun},
YEAR = {2000},
PAGES = {7},
NOTE = {28 January. Business Section},
ANNOTE = {This is a longer article on Johansen getting
arrested that describes some of the campaigns to
have him freed.}
}
@ARTICLE{Lee2001,
AUTHOR = {Jennifer Lee},
TITLE = {U.S. Arrests Russian Cryptographer as Copyright
Violator},
JOURNAL = {New York Times},
YEAR = {2001},
PAGES = {},
NOTE = {18 July. Section C, Page 8, Column 1},
ANNOTE = {This is the first article I could find in the
mainstream media detailing what happened with Dmitri
Sklyarov.}
}
@MISC{Moglen2001,
AUTHOR = {Eben Moglen},
TITLE = {The dotCommunist Manifesto: How Culture Became
Property and What We're Going to Do About It},
HOWPUBLISHED = {Published Electronically at:
\url{http://www.ibiblio.org/moglen}},
YEAR = {2001},
NOTE = {University of North Carolina. November 8},
ANNOTE = {This is the speech given at UNC. It does follow a
bit of the manifesto form. It's moving, contains
lots of great stories and a good deal of theoretical
basis. A fantastic resource.}
}
@BOOK{Patterson1968,
AUTHOR = {Lyman Ray Patterson},
TITLE = {Copyright in Historical Perspective},
PUBLISHER = {Vanderbilt University Press},
YEAR = {1968},
ADDRESS = {Nashville, TN},
ANNOTE = {Vaidhyanathan recommends it as a good general account
of the development of copyright. It is narrative in
nature but relatively entraining and well
researched. It has a chapter on ``Copyright in
Historic Perspective'' which is well suited to my
description of copyright in a socio-historical
context. Unfortunately, the book is almost wholly
limited to the UK and focuses the vast majority of
its discussion on very early or pre-copyright
periods.}
}
@BOOK{Thomas1967,
AUTHOR = {Denis Thomas},
TITLE = {Copyright and the Creative Artist},
PUBLISHER = {Institute of Economic Affairs, LTD},
YEAR = {1967},
ADDRESS = {London, UK},
ANNOTE = {The monograph is highly geared toward music and is
slightly less useful than it might otherwise be. Has
a section on economic effects and creativity with
several subsections on the pressures on copyright
term limits which should do a good job of summing up
some of the issues in terms of the limit the terms
of copyright.}
}
@BOOK{OTA1989,
AUTHOR = {Technology Assessment, Office of},
TITLE = {Copyright and Home Copying: Technology Challenges
the Law},
PUBLISHER = {Congress of the United States, Office of Technology
Assessment},
YEAR = {1989},
ANNOTE = {The book prepared by the OTA seems highly biased in
favor of the RIAA and MPAA which consulted on the
writing of the document but also talks a lot about
the Sony Supreme Court case and the way that
copyright holders can be overly hesitant in regards
to new technologies.}
}
@BOOK{USCO1963,
AUTHOR = {United States Copyright Office},
TITLE = {Copyright enactments: laws passed in the United
States since 1783 relating to copyright.},
PUBLISHER = {Copyright office, Library of Congress},
YEAR = {1963},
EDITION = {Rev},
OPTANNOTE = {extra description is unnecessary}
}
@BOOK{Gere1987,
AUTHOR = {Anne Ruggles Gere},
TITLE = {Writing Groups: History, Theory and Implications},
PUBLISHER = {Souther Illinois University Press},
YEAR = {1987},
ADDRESS = {Carbondale, IL},
ANNOTE = {Gere's study spans over 100 years and argues that
writing groups are neither new or novel and that
they exist both within and beyond the
academy. Leonard has a very complimentary
description in his bibliography.}
}
@BOOK{Lessig1999,
AUTHOR = {Lawrence Lessig},
TITLE = {Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace},
PUBLISHER = {Basic Books},
YEAR = {},
ADDRESS = {New York, NY},
ANNOTE = {This book introduces Lessig's idea of ``code'' which
he uses to refer to both technical and legal
mechanisms for control. He also connects to this the
economic pressures often motivating control. His
work provides a great resource in describing the
political nature of technical design and in
connecting the technical to legal.}
}
@BOOK{Stallman2002,
AUTHOR = {Richard M. Stallman},
EDITOR = {Joshua Gay},
TITLE = {Free Software Free Society},
PUBLISHER = {GNU Press},
YEAR = {2002},
ADDRESS = {Boston, MA},
EDITION = {1st},
ANNOTE = {Contains most of RMS's major essays on free software
philosophy, history and applications to other
areas. It's a good reference for introducing the
free software model. It also contains ``The Right to
Read'' which is a great story by RMS that ties uses
the metaphor of reading to describe proprietary
code.}
}
@BOOK{Raymond1999,
AUTHOR = {Eric S. Raymond},
EDITOR = {Tim O'Reilly},
TITLE = {The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and
Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary},
PUBLISHER = {O'Reilly and Associates},
YEAR = {1999},
ADDRESS = {Sebastopol, CA},
ANNOTE = {Contains a number of essays by ESR including the
famous Cathedral and Bazaar. Most essays are
available on the Internet on ESR's website. The
title essay contains the most famous description of
why the decentralized and collaborative processes
behind Linux and Open Source are so wildly
successful.}
}
@BOOK{Pool1997,
AUTHOR = {Robert Pool},
TITLE = {Beyond Engineering},
PUBLISHER = {Oxford University Press},
YEAR = {1997},
ADDRESS = {New York, NY},
ANNOTE = {Pool set out to write a story about nuclear power
but ended up writing a much broader analysis,
although he still keeps nuclear power as the central
example for the book. Rather than continuing to
describe the way that technology a affects society
in important ways, he describes the way that society
itself affects the development of technology. Pooly
says in the introduction: ``Invention is no longer,
as Ralph Waldo Emerson's aphorism had it, simply a
matter of 'Build a better mousetrap and the world
will beat a path to your door.' The world is already
at your door, and it is a few things to say about
that mousetrap.'' He also sets out one of his goals
of marrying the positivist and social constructionist
vision in regards to science and technology.}
}
@BOOK{Provenzo1986,
AUTHOR = {Eugene F. Provenzo, Jr.},
TITLE = {The Gutenberg Galaxy: Microcomputers and the
Emergence of Post-Typographical Culture},
PUBLISHER = {Teachers College Press},
YEAR = {1986},
ADDRESS = {Amsterdam, The Netherlands},
ANNOTE = {Provenzo picks up where McLuhan left off in The
Gutenberg Galaxy and compares the emergence of
microcomputers to the emergence of the printing press
and tries to analyze the social, intellectual and
political issues at the heart of the issue. He
introduces computer and describes this possibilities
with striking accuracy. He also hypothesizes that
the real power of the computer lies not in the
machines themselves but their ability to be
networked (29). He has a chapter on the Electronic
Scriptorium that compares the advances in
micro-computer technology to the type of information
sharing at the heart of the Renaissance but quickly
gets distracted by the idea of virtual universities
and new forms of scholarship.}
}
@BOOK{Schleifer2000,
AUTHOR = {Ronald Schleifer},
TITLE = {Analogical Thinking: Post-Enlightenment
Understanding in Language, Collaboration and
Interpretation},
PUBLISHER = {The University of Michigan Press},
YEAR = {2000},
ADDRESS = {Ann Arbor, MI},
ANNOTE = {Shleifer makes analogy this model for an interesting
definition of collaboration that, unfortunately, I
didn't find particularly relevant to my discussion
about control. It provides an interesting model that
may be worth exploring in more detail in another
place. It embraces a model of socio-historical
analysis and post-modern thought.}
}
@ARTICLE{Clifford1981,
AUTHOR = {John Clifford},
TITLE = {Composing in Stages: The Effects of a Collaborative
Pedagogy},
JOURNAL = {Research in the Teaching of English},
YEAR = {1981},
VOLUME = {15},
PAGES = {37-53},
ANNOTE = {Clifford designed a study that attempts to
``empirically test'' theories that claim that
collaboration (in the form of peer conference
groups) improved students' writing. He rigorously
control the groups and noted ``significantly higher
gains,'' in the group that was working
collaboratively over the groups that were not.}
}
@ARTICLE{Bruffee1973a,
AUTHOR = {Kenneth A. Bruffee},
TITLE = {Collaborative Learning: Some Practical Models},
JOURNAL = {College English},
YEAR = {1973},
VOLUME = {34},
NUMBER = {5},
PAGES = {634-643},
MONTH = {February},
ANNOTE = {The article introduces examples of collaborative
learning is extremely prevalent and effective
outside the classroom in a wide variety of areas. It
then describes the way that Bruffee has introduced
collaborative processes into the classroom and
describes wholly positive results that he has
enjoyed as a product. It is very geared toward
collaborative learning.}
}
@ARTICLE{Bruffee1981,
AUTHOR = {Kenneth A. Bruffee},
TITLE = {Comment and Response: Collaborative Learning},
JOURNAL = {College English},
YEAR = {1981},
VOLUME = {43},
NUMBER = {7},
PAGES = {745-747},
MONTH = {November},
ANNOTE = {This essay is part of an exchange with Richard
Gebhardt about the nature and dangers of
collaborative work and discussions of students who
might be unprepared for collaborative work. Neither
response seems like it's arguing over anything fully
substantive, at least to my argument.}
}
@ARTICLE{Gebhardt1981,
AUTHOR = {Richard Gebhardt},
TITLE = {Richard Gebhardt Responds},
JOURNAL = {College English},
YEAR = {1981},
VOLUME = {43},
NUMBER = {7},
PAGES = {747-749},
ANNOTE = {Response to Bruffee's response to Gebhardt's article
a year before. See the annotations on Bruffee1981 for
more information.}
}
@ARTICLE{Gebhardt1980,
AUTHOR = {Richard Gebhardt},
TITLE = {Teamwork and Feedback: Broadening the Base of
Collaborative Writing},
JOURNAL = {College English},
YEAR = {1980},
VOLUME = {42},
PAGES = {69-74},
ANNOTE = {Gebhardt advocates the use of peer conference groups
for invention and creation and argues that it
provides emotional support.}
}
@ARTICLE{Bruffee1984,
AUTHOR = {Kenneth A. Bruffee},
TITLE = {A Collaborative Learning and the 'Conversation of
Mankind'},
JOURNAL = {College English},
YEAR = {1984},
VOLUME = {46},
NUMBER = {7},
PAGES = {635-652},
ANNOTE = {This is Bruffee's longest and most in-depth article
on collaborative writing and collaborative
learning. In it, introduces the ideas upon which
collaborative learning is based. He connects writing
and learning with a different method for approaching
thought as a community process. He references Kuhn
and uses this to make an argument about how English
should be taught collaboratively.}
}
@ARTICLE{Stewart1988,
AUTHOR = {Donald C. Stewart},
TITLE = {Collaborative Learning and Composition: Boon or
Bane?},
JOURNAL = {Rhetoric Review},
YEAR = {1988},
VOLUME = {7},
PAGES = {58-83},
ANNOTE = {Stewart describes collaborative learning as a path
to ``totalitarian societies in which the individual
is completely subjected to and subjugated by the
will of the group.'' He dislikes social
constructivism, he seems to dislike social
scientists, and he associates the term collaboration
with World War II collaborators. He feels that
collaborative writing is impossible for introverts.}
}
@ARTICLE{Bruffee1986,
AUTHOR = {Kenneth A. Bruffee},
TITLE = {Kenneth A. Bruffee Responds},
JOURNAL = {College English},
YEAR = {1986},
VOLUME = {48},
NUMBER = {1},
PAGES = {77-78},
ANNOTE = {Kenneth Bruffee defending his vision of
collaborative learning and collaborative writing as
he response to Johnson--an article that is currently
not listed in this database.}
}
@BOOK{Writer1966,
AUTHOR = {Alexander Hamilton and James Madison and John Jay},
EDITOR = {Benjamin Fletcher Wright},
TITLE = {The Federalist},
PUBLISHER = {Belknap Press of Harvard University Press},
YEAR = {1966},
ADDRESS = {Cambridge, MA},
ANNOTE = {Madison's paper 43 opens up with a paragraph about
copyright and why it is important in American law
and why Article 1, Section 8 is important in the
beginning of the new country.}
}
@BOOK{Bollier2002,
AUTHOR = {David Bollier},
TITLE = {Silent Theft: The Private Plunder of Our Common
Wealth},
PUBLISHER = {Routledge Press},
YEAR = {2002},
ADDRESS = {New York, NY},
ANNOTE = {Bollier puts forward a metaphor of the commons to
tie together a number of different movements like
the environmental movement and the free software
movement.}
}
@BOOK{Lefevre1987,
AUTHOR = {Karen Burke LeFevre},
TITLE = {Invention as a Social Act},
PUBLISHER = {Southern Illinois University Press},
YEAR = {1987},
ADDRESS = {Carbondale, IL},
ANNOTE = {Chapter 4 pertains specifically to invention as a
collaborative act and provides a theoretical
foundation as well as examples of collaborative
views. It includes classical rhetoric as well as
modern applications. It has a great bibliography.}
}
@BOOK{Spigelman2000,
AUTHOR = {Candace Spigelman},
TITLE = {Across Property Lines: Textual Ownership in Writing
Groups},
PUBLISHER = {Southern Illinois University Press},
YEAR = {2000},
ADDRESS = {Carbondale, IL},
ANNOTE = {Spigelman looks at writing groups, people not
coauthoring texts but engaging in peer review. Her
case studies are a group of creative writers and a
group of students. She uses the metaphor of
ownership and intellectual property to make claims
about the way that authorship troubles, and even can
help collaborative writing.}
}
@ARTICLE{Oakes1984,
AUTHOR = {Janice E. Oakes},
TITLE = {Copyright and the First Amendment: Where Lies the
Public Interest?},
JOURNAL = {Tulane Law Review},
YEAR = {1984},
VOLUME = {59},
MONTH = {October},
ANNOTE = {Oakes argues that because of the idea/expression
dichotomy, there should ideally be no
copyright/first amendment conflict. However, she
notes that often, ``ideas alone are not sufficient
to enable an author to express his own ideas, and
the rights of free speech and free press demand
access to the particular from of expression
contained in a copyrighted work.'' She argues that
this is the reason that has historically been, an
needs to be very narrow, encompassing only the
author's theories and original expression of
particular facts.}
}
@ARTICLE{Pfaffenberger2001,
AUTHOR = {Bryan Pfaffenberger},
TITLE = {Why Open Content Matters},
JOURNAL = {Linux Journal},
YEAR = {2001},
VOLUME = {30},
MONTH = {April 11},
ANNOTE = {Pfaffenberger makes a concise argument for the
importance of open content and argues that the free
software's license based model is the only way to do
it correctly.}
}
@MISC{Benkler2001,
AUTHOR = {Yochai Benkler},
TITLE = {Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and the Nature of the
Firm},
HOWPUBLISHED = {Published Electronically at:
\url{http://www.benkler.org/CoasesPenguin.PDF}},
MONTH = {October},
YEAR = {2001},
ANNOTE = {This long piece tries to investigation collaboration
as an emerging type of peer production exemplified
by Linux and facilitated by new technology. It's
implications for collaborative writing are
important.}
}
@BOOK{Speck1999,
EDITOR = {Bruce W. Speck, Teresa R. Johnson, Catherine P. Dice
and Leon B. Heaton},
TITLE = {Collaborative Writing: An Annotated Bibliography},
PUBLISHER = {Greenwood Press},
YEAR = {1999},
ADDRESS = {Westport, CT},
ANNOTE = {The annotated bibliography is large, exhaustive for
work before 1999, and the annotations are
consistently informative and good. The book is
largely split into collaboration in the classroom
and in non-academic settings which is presents an
awkward division for my analysis. However, it proved
invaluable in the research of computer supported
collaboration several other sections.}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Meiklejohn1975,
AUTHOR = {Alexander Meiklejohn},
TITLE = {The First Amendment is an Absolute},
BOOKTITLE = {Free Speech and Association: The Supreme Court and
the First Amendment},
PAGES = {1-22},
PUBLISHER = {The University of Chicago Press},
YEAR = {1975},
EDITOR = {Philip B. Kurland},
ADDRESS = {Chicago, IL},
ANNOTE = {Meiklejohn lays out a strong argument for the
protection of free speech by arguing that the point
of free speech is in promoting a democratic
discourse. As a result, speech with direct political
implications must be strongly speech but so much all
speech that informs a democratic speech which,
interpreted broadly as argues, would include almost
everything and provide a robust system of protection.}
}
@MISC{CreativeCommons2003a,
AUTHOR = {Creative Commons},
TITLE = {Projects: Founders' Copyright},
HOWPUBLISHED = {Published Electronically at:
\url{http://creativecommons.org/projects/founderscopyright}},
YEAR = {2003},
NOTE = {Accessed 13 April 2003},
ANNOTE = {The Founders' Copyright is a contractual agreement
between CC and a copyright holder where the
copyright holder agrees to release their work into
the public domain after fourteen years which is the
original duration of copyright as stated by the
United States' founding fathers.}
}
@BOOK{Leuf2001,
AUTHOR = {Bo Leuf and Ward Cunningham},
TITLE = {The Wiki Way: Quick Collaboration on the Web},
PUBLISHER = {Addison Wesley},
YEAR = {2001},
ADDRESS = {Upper Saddle River, NJ},
ANNOTE = {This book is co-authored by the inventor of the
Wiki, Ward Cunningham and describes the design,
history and usefulness of Wikis. It's not completely
clear why such a large book was necessary but it
provides everything I need and more on Wikis for the
tech section.}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Foucault2002,
AUTHOR = {Michel Foucault},
TITLE = {What is an Author?},
BOOKTITLE = {The Book History Reader},
PAGES = {225-230},
PUBLISHER = {Routledge},
YEAR = {2002},
EDITOR = {David Finkelstein and Alistair McCleery},
CHAPTER = {15},
ADDRESS = {New York, NY},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@INCOLLECTION{Barthes2002,
AUTHOR = {Roland Barthes},
TITLE = {The Death of the Author},
BOOKTITLE = {The Book History Reader},
PAGES = {221-224},
PUBLISHER = {Routledge},
YEAR = {2002},
EDITOR = {David Finkelstein and Alistair McCleery},
CHAPTER = {15},
ADDRESS = {New York, NY},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@ARTICLE{Benkler1999,
AUTHOR = {Yochai Benkler},
TITLE = {Free As the Air to Common Use: First Amendment
Constraints on the Enclosure of the Public Domain},
JOURNAL = {New York University Law Review},
YEAR = {1999},
MONTH = {May},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@ARTICLE{Netanel1996,
AUTHOR = {Neil W. Netanel},
TITLE = {Copyright and a Democratic Civil Society},
JOURNAL = {Yale Law Journal},
YEAR = {1996},
VOLUME = {106},
NUMBER = {2},
PAGES = {283-387},
MONTH = {November},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@BOOK{Barrett1989,
EDITOR = {Edward Barrett},
TITLE = {The Society of Text: Hypertext, Hypermedia and the
Social Construction of Information},
PUBLISHER = {MIT Press},
YEAR = {1989},
ADDRESS = {Cambridge, MA},
OPTANNOTE = {}
}
@ARTICLE{Barbato1986,
AUTHOR = {Joseph Barbato},
TITLE = {Giving up the Ghost},
JOURNAL = {Publishers Weekly},
YEAR = {1986},
VOLUME = {229},
NUMBER = {3},
PAGES = {34-38},
MONTH = {January},
DAY = {10},
ANNOTE = {Leonard's bibliography describes the way it
discusses the escalating scale of ``as-told-to,''
``with,'' and ``and.''}
}
@BOOK{Donoghue1998,
AUTHOR = {Emma Donoghue},
TITLE = {We are Michael Field},
PUBLISHER = {The Cromwell Press},
YEAR = {1998},
ADDRESS = {Trowbridge, UK},
ANNOTE = {This is a bit of biography about Michael Fields, a
name that friends and publishers used to refer to
two poet who collaborated on poetry. The women,
Katherine Bradly and Edith Cooper, lived and wrote
poetry together. Pages 34-38 describe the
collaboration. It's an interesting example,
especially from a feminist and lesbian
example. Their reasoning for using a joint pseudonym
is multifaceted and telling but perhaps more complex
than I can go into for this paper.}
}