Voice

I saw Lewis Lapham give a talk a couple months ago at the Boston Athenaeum on new media, the Internet, and civic discourse. My one sentence summary:

The problem with giving everyone the ability to raise their voices online is that it makes people less likely to raise their voices, or their fists, in the streets.

Published by

Benjamin Mako Hill

Rebel with rather too many causes. And your host!

3 thoughts on “Voice”

  1. Would it be fair to say that Lapham’s argument predicts that we would have seen more organized protests and unrest than we did in Iran if the net had been cut off there?

    That doesn’t match my intuition, but what-if scenarios are difficult to guess at.  (In particular, I think the video of Neda Soltan served as an very large incitement towards more unrest, and I doubt that the video was shown on state TV.)

  2. Another way of looking at it is that denying people freedom of speech is an incitement to violence.

    That’s why censorship is counter-productive.

    But of course, if you do want civil unrest, censorship is a great way of fomenting it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>