Law 49: Never Live With Folks Who Buy This Book

I once lived in a rather dysfunctional apartment. One of my roommates kept the "National Bestseller," The 48 Laws of Power in the bathroom to read while he was on the toilet. During my shift in the loo, I would look over the book as well and it provided a lot of insight into its owner’s personality. The book dispenses ideas from Machiavelli, Henry Kissinger, Louis XIV and other wells of wisdom and gives advice on how to be more "powerful" in your daily life with such aphorisms as, "never put too much trust in friends," "crush your enemies completely," and "discover each man’s thumbscrew."

The book is complete crap. I always found it somewhat humorous — in that "it would much funnier if I didn’t have to actually live with the person reading this book" sort of way — that my 21 year old roommate thought that advice given to a monarch half a millennia ago on the virtues of totally crushing ones’ enemies was highly relevant and applicable information.

I think that my roommate liked the book because it helped him rationalize being nasty to other people as a strategically important move in a bid for power. People seem to like books that explain why their faults are, in fact, strengths. If being petty and cruel is among you’re faults and you’re not itching to change, this may be the book for you.

Last time I was in a bookstore with friends and came across this book, my friend suggested that the rules sounded a lot like the Ferengi Rules of Acquisition from the Star Trek television series. I don’t have a TV but I’ll betray my geekiness and admit that I’ve certainly watched my share of Star Trek anyway. For those that don’t know, the Rules of Acquisition are the religious or societal underpinnings of an alien race that is basically Star Trek writers’ imaginative rendition of a people who have made greed, selfishness and pettiness their raison d’etre. I went ahead and looked up the rules and it’s true.

Here are three pairs of laws/rules:

  • Robert Greene and Joost Elffers say: "Law 1: never outshine the master."
  • Ferengis say: "Rule 33: It never hurts to suck up to the boss."
  • Robert Greene and Joost Elffers say: "Law 2: Never put too much trust in friends."
  • Ferengis say: "Rule 99: Trust is the biggest liability of all."
  • Robert Greene and Joost Elffers say: "Law 19: know who you’re dealing with — do not offend the wrong person."
  • Ferengis say: "Rule 194: It’s always good business to know about new customers before they walk in your door."

It’s uncanny; you can find a match for basically every "Law" in the book.

It’s a bit depressing when you find pillars of fictional dystopias being reproduced by folks with a straight-face in your own bathroom and on the New York Times bestseller list.

Rethinking The Whole Transparency Thing

I’m a pretty transparent person in the "it’s easy to stalk me" sense of the term. My address and phone number is on my webpage and I’m happy to post just about anything that I don’t think would anger people on my blog or my website.

Once at college, I was at a party and I met and started chatting with an attractive girl for the first time but whom I was marginally acquainted with (we had a discussion-based class the year before). Things were going great and, once I had revealed my geeky-disposition, conversation stumbled onto computer mediated communication. I tried to support one of my positions with a story about when I was on BBSs in my youth. She stopped and said that she knew. Completely surprised, I asked her how she could possibly know personal events from when I was twelve and living a country away. She admitted, sheepishly, that she’d read it on my website.

True enough, I had included this particular anecdote in largely autobiographical The Geek Shall Inherit the Earth: My Story of Unlearning which I wrote for the small Indian publication Vimukt Shiksha and had posted on my website. As you might imagine, it caught me a little off guard when I found out that this "near strange" had read my website and it threw the "chatting up" plan for a loop.

Now I expect some people to read my website; I wouldn’t bother putting things online otherwise. That said, I do not expect the girls I meet at parties to have read my website.

I’ve reflected a little bit on why I was shocked. I think I’m less worried about revealing embarrassing information or wrong information and more worried people will know all my good stories and examples. The worst part of this whole thing is that since then, this situation has been of my favorite stories and now it’s on my website.

Two Upcoming Talks

At the risk (read: sure thing) of appearing to self promote, I want to plug two talks I’ll be giving soon:

  • Tomorrow (Wednesday November 17, 2004), I’ll be talking at the New York Linux User Group (NYLUG) giving a talk on customizing Debian. The talk will be about customizing in a general sense pulling from my experience with Ubuntu and in a specific CDD sense pulling sense pulling from my experience with Debian-NP. You need to RSVP to attend and should do it quickly. If you miss the RSVP, you can meet up in the bar across the street for the Real Event afterward. Details are on the NYLUG website.
  • Next Friday (Friday, November 26, 2004), I’ll be giving a keynote address on Ubuntu at the GULEV Congreso Internacional de Software Libre in Veracruz Mexico. It’s just been finalized so it hasn’t even hit the conference website as I write this. You’ll need to visit the conference website for information on attending.

I know I’ll see some old friends and I hope to meet some new folks as well. Feel free to get a hold of me if you’d like to meet up at either event.

Being Green

I think being green — and I do not mean this in any of the metaphorical senses of the term but rather in the sense of having skin of a green hue — is a pretty undesirably thing overall.

That said, I’d be happy to be green if it meant I could photosynthesize.

A Finger By Any Other Name…

Mika and I were comparing the names of fingers and toes in different languages we know. Mika was saying that in addition to being called kusuri yubi (薬指 or "medicine or drug finger") and benisashi yubi (紅差指 or "lipstick finger"), Japanese people also call the "ring finger" mumeishi (無名指 or "no-name finger"). I think "no-name" is a pretty great name for a finger.

Hall Hall on Hill Hill

If I am ever rich and if my alma mater convinces me to donate a whole bunch of money, I will do it with the stipulation that they name a hill (that’s a hill, not a hall) on the campus after me. I think it would be nice to have a Hill Hill.

Bill Gates and his family donates lots of money to universities around the country and there are many Gates Halls. If I were him, I would donate the same amount of money but ask that the universities name gates, rather than halls, after me.

Imagine a school with the Gates Gates, Hill Hill, and Hall Hall. This is the type of institution of higher learning that I would trust our next generation’s future to.

Achieving True Skepticism

Sometimes people say they don’t believe in things to means that they don’t agree with or subscribe to a concept. Someone might say, "I don’t believe in tax cuts for the wealthy." I always think for half a second, "do you not believe that they are good or do not believe they exist." It’s entertaining to imagine not believing in common things that we take for granted.

If you think about it, such skepticism is is not always totally unjustified. I’ve heard of people that don’t believe in plate tectonics which, if you think about it, is not a totally insensible thing to not believe in (although I do believe in plate tectonics myself).

I think it would be a good experiment if everyone would, for one day, act as if they don’t believe in things that they have not personally seen or experienced convincing evidence of existence.

We should all spend one day in a world without big things, small things, or concepts; no germs, macroeconomics, political assassinations, and much more.

The next day we will return back to normal but I think we will all have a lot more perspective.

“Debian and Ubuntu” Talk Notes

I recently gave a talk at Gnubies: the New York City GNU/Linux group for beginners. The talk was aimed at complete beginners so it won’t have a lot of new information for anyone who is already familiar with the topics covered.

The talk discussed both Debian and Ubuntu and explored the overlap to introduce the concepts of Free Software philosophy that are important to both projects.

For those that are interested, I’ve posted the notes I used (I gave the talk without slides) for those that want to give their own talk in HTML and ReStructured Text source.

If I Had To Make an Undersea Diorama With Only One Fish…

Putting together a realistic undersea diorama must be difficult. The diorama-maker must work to create a dynamic environment implying movement and revealing a intriguing and ascetically appealing scene. As if this weren’t enough, they must also worry about balancing the fish model and getting the fish to hang at realistic angles.

This is all very difficult of course because they must also worry about carefully hiding or obscuring the supports that hold the fish in mid-air.

I think that underwater diorama makers must love the Tripod Fish (Bathypterois) pictured below.

/copyrighteous/images/tripod_fish_thumb.png

Black Smokers

Today I learned about black smokers. For those who (like me earlier today) do not know, black smokers are underwater mineral-rich hydrothermal vents and the large chimney like structures that form around them.

A black smoker (of the hydothermal variety) is in the first picture below. It’s not to be confused with the black smoker (of the golf legend variety) in the second picture below.

/copyrighteous/images/black_smoker.jpg

Figure 1: Black Smoker (Anonymous)

/copyrighteous/images/charlie_sifford.png

Figure 2: Black Smoker (Charlie Sifford)

In related news, I don’t care how many cigarette-smoking, dark-skinned, hydrothermal vent researches there are. There are not enough.

The War on Share™

I read a bit of news today including this report on the fact that the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) is going to be following in the footsteps of the RIAA and suing ordinary folks who are sharing movies online.

The recording industry’s business has demonstrably taken a hit in the last decade or so. You can argue that it’s not P2P’s fault but it seems clear to me that P2P has had an impact. The film industry, however, is not in the same position to make these arguments which strikes me as very interesting.

I see two possibilities for their actions; I’m sure that the truth is a combination of the two.

First, the film industry suspect that at some point in the near future, their business model will become both (a) increasingly — and perhaps totally — dependent on digital film distribution and (b) increasingly aversely affected by film sharing online.

The second possibility is that the entertainment companies know that there is a lot more at stake that the +/- sign and the number before the percentage symbol on their annual reports. The music and film industries are the ones producing the vast majority of the content on peer-to-peer networks; that will not and can not persist if things continue the way they are going. Something will break and I’m quite sure that it will not be P2P. If nothing else (and I don’t believe this is unlikely) the modern industry will have its own ability to produce in the way it does today (i.e., its business model and financial viability) ripped out from underneath it. While the industry would have you believe otherwise, this will not spell the end of either music or film. History books teach us that both existed before Michael Eisner, Ted Turner, or even Rupert Murdoch.

P2P’s real power lies in its ability to distribute what can be produced (and funded) in new creative ways that are sustainable through P2P’s less coercive model of distribution. The players currently dominant in the culture industries feel (rightfully) that they have little to gain from exploring this road or even finding out what it might look like.

Big music and big film has everything to lose and they must know it. They are not about to let a radically different type of distribution technology and a couple thousand years of human attitudes towards the way communities should and should not control ideas and information undermine their position of power. They will fight to install legal and technological artifice to keep the power and money they gained through the economic realities of physical distribution in the digital realm. They will spend every last billion fighting.

That brings us to back today and the MPAA’s new response to what even they admit is an infantile threat of digital piracy on their business model.

I think P2P is a threat to the MPAA but not in the way that they would have you believe. Making film for theaters would be a sustainable industry; the industry did, after all, try to eliminate Betamax and VCRs altogether. But this isn’t about creating sustainable industries — with or without P2P. It’s about preserving power and creating growth.

This Weblog Post is Official Election Mail

As many USians have done or will do soon, I fulfilled my civic duty today. Since I vote in Washington State and have recently moved to New York City, I voted by absentee ballot.

Here’s a (washed out) snapshot of the envelope that my ballot will be making its way across the country in:

/copyrighteous/images/vote_envelope_small.jpg

You can tell, from the logo in the top middle of the envelope that it is Official Election Mail.

Here’s a close up of that logo, reserved "for use by election officials" by the postal service to, as noted here, "enhance the identification and ensure proper handling of this important type of official communication." Here is a clearer shot of the logo:

/copyrighteous/images/election_mail_logo.png

You can tell, from the "TM" in the logo, that Official Election Mail is a trademark.

This is completely ridiculous. Trademark law is created to to keep consumers from being confused by manufacturers trying to unfairly capitalize off the goodwill created by one company; to allow consumers to associate a certain level of quality with a certain brand or company. There is hardly a market in Official Election Mail. As much as I would like to shop around for a better ballot when I find the choices on mine lacking, this is not the case.

I can think of any numbers of different legal ways to stop people from putting Official Election Mail logos on the top of their mail — mail fraud and election tampering are simply the first two that come to mind. Trademarks (and every branch of IP for that matter) were created as limited and narrowly defined legal instruments to fulfill a particular purpose. They were not all-purpose ways to keep people from saying things you rather they not say. This is not a trademark issue and it doesn’t need to be.

By asserting a trademark in a place where one is not necessary and where historically trademarks would not be used, it’s a symptom and a reinforcement of the the "IP for everything" culture. It is an expansion and an abuse.

Trademarks still strike me as mostly pro-consumer and they’re the arm of intellectual property law that I have the least significant problems with. This sort of thing makes me reconsider that position.

To Be Truly Clean

Dr. Bronner’s may be hippy soap but it’s my favorite soap. I like it for two reasons:

First, it gets my body very clean and leaves me smelling like peppermint, lavendar, or something else pleasant.

Second, it makes me laugh because the bottle is covered with what seems like 5pt ramblings offering advice about love and cleanliness in "God’s Spaceship Earth." You can read an example label here or browse through the complete list.

I ran across this Yiddish Proverb recently: What soap is to the body, laughter is to the soul.

I think that if you ignore the label’s claim that it can also be used as toothpaste, this is truly a perfect cleaning solution.

It’s A girl!

As I was scanning through the strongly connected set trust analysis last night. I noticed this UID on key 0x3CDB1972:

 Marina Bykova (A girl) <mbykova@cs.ohiou.edu> 

"A girl," enclosed in parentheses, is a comment and is usually not something one needs to verify when doing a keysigning.

Hypothetically speaking (as I have no reason to believe that Marina Bykova (A girl) is not A girl), I can’t help but wonder: If I met Marina and Marina was not A girl, should I sign the key?