Ending Software Patents

Last week, the Free Software Foundation announced an important new initiative called End Software Patents whose goals are pretty evident from the project’s name. So far, the initiative is backed by the FSF, the Public Patent Foundation, and the Software Freedom Law Center.

There are several organizations who are taking on specific bad patents but ESP is unique in that it is activitely working toward the abolition of software patents in the United States. While the organization is focused on work in the US, it’s deeply important globally — much of the world’s patent law is "exported" from the US.

The FSF is stretching extremely limited resources in backing ESP to help it get off the ground because we believe two things:

  • First, software patents are a fundamental threat to free and open source software (but not just to free and open source software). The FSF must oppose software patents because they provide a fundamental threat to free software’s continued success. That sounds like hyperbole but is unfortunately not.
  • Second, we can win this fight. For a whole set of reasons, the successful abolition of software patents is a goal that, while extremely ambitious, is also within grasp. These issues, of course, are much bigger than free software. Companies spend billions of dollars in litigation over software patents that are not novel and that should not exist. ESP can reach out farther than the FSF alone and build a coalition that can destroy software patents for the good of much more than the free software community.

Please read the new ESP report on the state of software patents written by the ESP Executive Director Ben Klemens to understand why we are optimistic. And please, support ESP financially in this fight. ESP’s continued work is not ensured past the immediate future. Your support will help endow a bright future for the next generation of software developers and users.

4 thoughts on “Ending Software Patents”

  1. I would say that this goal is attainable in that any goal is attainable.  The likelihood of actually reaching this goal is extremely small.
    That doesn’t mean it’s not a worthwhile goal though.

  2. I support the end of software patents (code should be protected by copyright only IMHO). But I think the ESP is going to be ineffective by having people ask their presidential candidate for support. What needs to be done is:

    * Draft a bill to end software patents.
    * Get a congress-critter to sponsor the bill.
    * Have the public contact their representatives and senators to support said bill.
    * Lobby the administration to support the bill.

  3. In the second bullet point you:

    …the successful abolition of software is a goal that…

    Maybe should be software patents?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>