Once, I was telling an executive in a large technology company that mostly builds non-free technologies why I did not like most of their products and business decisions and about some of the things that I was doing to help their consumers work around them and avoid paying them in the future.
Excited, the manager suggested that I consider a job with them at least in part as an advocate for these ideas within their company. I mentioned that my criticism was primarily principled and fundamental to the way his company did business. He responded, "yes, but if you take a job with us, you get to have your principles and a BMW."
I don't think he understood my principles. Perhaps, he didn't understand principles at all.



Responses to This Post
grrr
Some guy: I don't understand why you feel upset or offended and feel the need to make snide comments. I wasn't trying to say that I was better than anyone -- only that people don't share my principles one's principle tend to have a very cavalier attitude toward them. It's true that a nice car and principled stand on software freedom might be mutually exclusive for some people and different people will choose one or the other -- but that was my point after all.
Best of luck with the job hunt!
Does someone deciding that it's inconvenient to apply ethics to their situation mean that the situation should be free from ethical criticism, then? What decides if work is "honest", other than ethics?
I think when you use "honest" like that, you're exactly calling out to a definition of "honest" that talks about ethics rather than pure honesty; there's nothing positive in behaving destructively while being honest about it.
- Chris.